Renaissance Martial Arts
Literature
|
"Princes
and Lords learn to survive with this art, in earnest and in play.
But if you are fearful, then you should not learn to fence.
Because a despondent heart will always be defeated, regardless of all
skill."
- Fechtmeister Sigmund Ringeck, 1440
“So
from this art comes all sorts of good, with arms cities are subdued
and all the crowds restrained; and in itself has such dignity,
that often it brings joy to the heart, and always drives out cowardice
…If you will be renowned in the art, you’ll never be poor,
in any place. This virtue is so glorious that,
if even once poverty would show you his cards,
then wealth will embrace you thanks to your art.”
- Maestro Filippo Vadi, Liber de Arte Gladiatoria Dimicandi,
c.1482
|
 |
The little known surviving
treatises and guidebooks of fighting skills produced by European
authors are numerous and diverse.
Books and manuscripts on personal combat skills
flourished in the 15th and 16th
centuries. The
oldest known European fighting text is an anonymous German sword and
buckler manual (MS I.33) produced around c. 1295. Its watercolor pages
feature a series of images of a monk and his partner performing various
attacks and counter attacks and has recently come to be more
appreciated as a source for study of historical European martial arts. The writings of the great
Swabian master Johannes Liechtenauer in the 1380s were highly
influential among German masters for the next two centuries. His
teachings, as chronicled by by the priest and master-at-arms, Hanko
Doebringer, were expanded and written on by many others throughout the
1400s and early 1500s including Paulus Kal, Peter Falkner, Hans von
Speyer, Ludwig Von Eyb, Gregor Erhart, Sigmund Schining, Andre
Pauernfeindt, and others. A major one of these commentators was that of
Sigmund Ringeck in the 1450s and Peter Von Danzig in the 1450s. Among
their teachings, these Fechtbuchs (“fight books” or “fencing books”)
present a consistent emphasis on unarmored foot-combat with long-swords
that incorporate grappling techniques.
With the development
of printmaking in Europe during the 1400s, there also came a revival of
science and classical humanism. Both prints and drawings were integral
in the effort to communicate rediscoveries as
well as new ideas.
In 1410 the Bolognese master
Fiore dei Liberi produced a systematic work, Flos
Duellatorium in Armis, which represents the major Italian
contribution to 15th century martial arts
literature. Three different editions of Fiore’s work survive and have
become major resources for modern students.
The Fechtbuch of Hans Talhoffer covering among other
things, swordplay, judicial combat, dagger fighting and wrestling was
also influential. It was produced in several versions from the 1440s to
1460s. Other important fighting texts surviving from the 15th
century include works such as the Codex Wallerstein,
the anonymous “Gladiatorie” and “Goliath” manuscripts, as well as the Solothurner
Fechtbuch. There is also an anonymous 15th century work on
the use of the medieval pole-axe, Le Jeu de la Hache.
The King of Portugal, Dom Duarte, produced several
training texts in the 1420s. While
two obscure 15th century works on swordplay from
England also survive (the MS 3542 and MS 39564 documents). Fabian von Auerswald also
produced a detailed wrestling manuscript about 1462, of which a
well-illustrated later edition still exists.
Fillipo Vadi in the 1480s
produced another major Italian work on fighting from the period, which
was highly influenced by Fiore’s. The Hispano-Italian knight Pietro
Monte produced several tittles on fighting and combat skills during the
1480s and ‘90s, including the first published
wrestling book. Hans Czynner produced an illustrated color work of
armored combat on the techniques of “half-swording” and dagger fighting
in armor. Hanns Wurm’s colorfully inked manual, Das
Ringersbuch, of c. 1500 features a range of illustrated
wrestling moves and is characteristic of unarmed texts of the period. Around 1512 the
artist Albrecht DŸrer produced a beautifully and realistically drawn
work illustrating sword and wrestling techniques.
Several versions of Jšrg Wilhalm’s work survive
including a large hand-written color 1523 edition featuring an array of
unarmored and armored long sword techniques.
About 1540 Paulus Hector Mair compiled an immense
and a well-illustrated tome on weapon arts including swords, staffs,
daggers, and other weapons.
Di Antonio Manciolino’s work of
1531 is the first known printed Italian fencing manual.
One of the more significant masters of the 1500s was
the Bolognese teacher Achille
Marrozo. His Opera Nova of 1536 is considered the first text to emphasize the use
of the thrust as well as the cut in using a slender tapering
single-hand blade. His work however still covered the traditional
military weapons of the age.
In 1548 the Spanish knight
Juan Quixada de Reayo produced a little known text on mounted combat
that reflects traditional 15th century methods. In 1550 the
Florentine master and contemporary of Marozzo, Francesco Altoni, wrote
his own fencing text that disputed some ideas of Marozzo. Often attributed to the
1570s, Angelo Viggianni's significant work of 1551, Lo
Schermo, also focused on the use
of a long, slender, tapering single-hand sword.
Camillo Agrippa’s treatise on the
science of arms from 1553 was one of the first to focus on use
of the thrust over the cut in civilian swordplay. Considered another
one of the more significant Italian fencing works of the 1500s,
Agrippa’s treatise also represents the transition from military to
civilian swordplay and the use of even more narrow swords.
The Dutch artist Martinus
Heemskreck in 1552 illustrated a text, Fechten &
Ringen, with several woodcuts of short sword, two-handed
sword, and wrestling. The German master Joachim Meyer
in 1570 produced a large and extremely well illustrated training manual
that represents one of the high points of 16th
century works. The
work covered a host of assorted swords and weapons and combined some
Italian and German elements. Meyer included material on classroom play
as well as earnest self-defence.
Jacob Sutor later produced a fighting manual in 1612
that was mostly an updated version of Meyer’s earlier work.
In 1570, Giacomo Di Grassi
produced, His True Arte of Defense, a major work on
fencing from the period that reveals elements of the changing nature of
civilian self-defense concerns and the development of slender duelling
swords. An English version was first translated in 1594. The Italian Girolamo
Cavalcabo’s work of c.1580, concerned primarily with sword and dagger,
was translated into German and French several times over the coming
decades. In 1595
Vincentio Saviolo produced, His Practice in Two Books,
one of the more influential (and today popular) of late Renaissance
manuals. Saviolo’s
method reflects the changing form of civilian blade in use. An English version of the
text was influential at the time.
Giovanni
Antonio Lovino in 1580 produced a large and elaborate fencing treatise
on rapier as well as other swords and weapons. Until recently, only
limited portions of Lovino’s work were previously known. Other important Italian
fencing works of the late Renaissance include those by the masters
Giovanni Dell’Agochie in 1572, Camillo Palladini from c. 1580, Alfonso
Fallopia in 1584, Nicoletto Giganti in 1606, Salvator Fabris also in
1606, and later Francesco Alfieri in 1640.
Nearly all these works reflect the transition from
military swords to the civilian duelling rapiers.
In 1610, the Ridolfo Capo Ferro’s, Gran
Simulacro, was first published.
Considered the great Italian master of the rapier
and father of modern fencing, his work codified much of civilian
foyning fence for the duel. These Italian fencing texts offer some of
the best of illustrated examples of rapier fencing.
The master Jeronimo De Carranza
wrote his influential tome on Spanish fencing, De La
Philosophia de las Armas,
in 1569. It was to become one of two major Spanish fencing manuals that
formed the heart of the Spanish school for later centuries. The other great Spanish
master of the age was Don Luis P. de Narvaez, who’s 1599, Libro
de las Grandezas de la Espada
(“Book
of the Grandeur of the Sword”) presented rapier material somewhat
different than his master Carranza's. Narvaez’s book is the other of
only two major Spanish fencing manuals from the time. Several Spanish
masters during the 1600s produced fencing books rewriting the teachings
of Carranza or Narvaez and favouring one or the other.
In
1640, Mendes de
Carmona, a fencing master from Seville, produced his, Libro de la destreza berdadera de las armas,
an
unpublished manuscript recently discovered.
The young Italian soldier and
swordsman, Frederico Ghisliero, in 1587 produced an unpublished work,
the Regole, revealing connections to
Spanish styles. About 1600 Don Pedro de Heredia produced his, TraitŽ
des Armes, an
illustrated color manuscript on rapier that included grappling
techniques. Heredia was a master-of-arms, cavalry captain and member of
the war council of the king of Spain. His work represents a pragmatic
Spanish style not wrapped in the geometrical ideas of Carranza and
Narvaez. Heredia’s manual is evidence the Spanish school was neither
uniform nor monolithic. Mendes
de Carmona’s,
Libro de la destreza berdadera de las armas,
an unpublished manuscript of 1640 has also recently been rediscovered. Carmona was a fencing master in
Seville, who previously wrote a work on Carranza’s method. His previously unknown work is a
substantial manuscript covering the principles and fundamentals of
fencing and tactics to use in specific situations. The most elaborate and lavishly
illustrated Renaissance fencing text was that of Girard Thibault
d’Anvers', Academie De L'Espee (c. 1630), written
in French by a Flemish master teaching a version of the Spanish rapier.
The
only truly French fencing texts known from the Renaissance are that of
Henry de Sainct Didier in 1573, Tracicte’
contenan les ecrets du premier livre de l’espee seule, and Francois Dancie wrote his L’espŽe
de Combat,
in Tulle, in 1623. The next known is Charles
Besnard’s later, Le Maitre d’arme Liberal, of 1653.
The master George Silver
published his Paradoxes of Defense defending
traditional English swordplay in 1599. He wrote his, Brief
Instructions Upon my Paradoxes of Defence,
a year later. His work is the primary source for information on English
methods of martial arts from the Renaissance and is a favorite study
source for modern students of historical fencing.
Silver, a critic of the rapier, pragmatically
described the use of short sword or back-sword, buckler, staff, and
dagger. In 1614,
George Hale wrote, The Private Schoole of Defence,
commenting on English fighting schools of the day as well as
recommendations on the rapier method.
In 1617 Joseph Swetnam wrote a rapier and back sword
treatise entitled, The Schoole of the Noble and Worthy
Science of Defence and in 1639 one “G. A.” published a book
on swordsmanship, Pallas Armata - The
Gentleman's Armory. It
has been suggested that the author was one, Gideon Ashwell. By 1650 the
Marquise of Newcastle wrote his own short treatise, The
Truthe off the Sorde, a little-known work based on the
Spanish School.
This
description of Renaissance martial arts literature is far from
complete. Many other fighting manuals were certainly produced in the 16th
and 17th centuries by a host of other masters
and writers. In
1620 for example, Hans Wilhelm Schšffer fashioned an enormous work, Fechtkunst,
that contained 672 crude rapier illustrations each one fully described
and annotated. Other
German fencing teachers in the early 1600s were rewriting Italian
texts.
The teachings of these masters
do not appear to reflect a set "style" or a "Way" so much as a
systematic tradition of using proven and efficient techniques within a
sophisticated understanding of general fighting principles. Much of
what we know of these many guidebooks and fighting treatises is
changing and expanding. Although
just beginning, serious modern study and interpretation of Renaissance
martial arts literature is now well underway.
In addition to those described here, many other
martial arts manuals were known to have been produced, but existing
copies have yet to be found. Previously
unexamined collections that have recently become available and should
soon open up will inevitably bring to light even more source manuals. It is an exciting time for
research as the hunt for further Renaissance martial arts literature
continues.
View our original web documentary
series on
the Martial Arts of Renaissance Europe here:

|